Dist. Rule 56.1 Stmt. Because the bargaining agreement had expired three and one-half years earlier, and the bargaining unit had not had a wage increase in that time, the Union decided that it would be in the best interest of its members to agree to the County's demands. Local 456 represents both public sector and private sector employees. ( Id. july 1, 2016 2019 - june 30, 20192023 . Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act A. at 28-29.) The court focused on the union's motivation, and stated that "union action which adversely affects a member is discipline only when (1) it is undertaken under color of the union's right to control the member's conduct in order to protect the interests of the union or its membership, and (2) it directly penalizes him in a way which separates him from comparable members in good standing." While the city's appeal was pending, settlement negotiations ensued between the city and the union. 1996). The union representatives on the negotiating committee submitted a counter-offer concerning the removal of the Senior ACAs. The Center for Union Facts is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that fights for transparency and accountability in Americas labor movement. relating to the negotiations from January 1, 1998 to present which ultimately resulted in the Stipulation of Agreement." ( Id.). ), On June 14, 1999, the president of Local 456 sent a letter to the members of the bargaining unit, advising that a ratification vote would be taken on June 21, 1999 and including a copy of the Stipulation of Agreement. Law 201(7)(a); In the Matter of Lippman, 263 A.D.2d 891, 694 N.Y.S.2d 510 (1999), public employers and public employee unions have the right to alter by agreement the composition of their bargaining units. 0 New York. Want updates when International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 456 has new information, or want to find more organizations like International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 456? (Am.Complt. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. As of Feb 21, 2023, the average annual pay for a Teamster in the United States is $67,528 a year. ( Id. ( Id. . Average CEO Pay Up $14.5 Million. 411(a)(5)." ( Id. 1940). 1965), aff'd 356 F.2d 984 (3d Cir. 1996), aff'd, 110 F.3d 892 (2d Cir. Additional copies of the agreement were provided and the agreement was read to the membership. Please see our Privacy Policy. 852, Civil Serv. To the extent that defendant's Rule 56.1 Statement relies upon facts set forth in Lucyk's affidavit and admitted by plaintiffs, we will consider defendant's Rule 56.1 statement admitted by plaintiffs. $1000 salary base builder, $4600 in increased and new stipends and and optional zero pay prescription plan (some wanted to stay with the current plan as is). at 28.) This Brownfield Cleanup Program project, supported with our tax dollars, is using non-union contractor Titan Concrete. According to the undisputed facts, plaintiffs have failed to state a claim under section 101(a)(4) of the LMRDA, and summary judgment for defendant on this claim is granted. 493 U.S. at 94, 110 S.Ct. Plaintiffs also allege a violation of 101(a)(5) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. (Am.Complt. Plaintiffs argue that the only way that the County could have removed them from the bargaining unit was by applying to the New York State Public Employment Relations Board ("PERB") to have their job titles deemed "confidential" or "managerial. SHAD Alliance v. Smith Haven Mall, 66 N.Y.2d 496, 505, 488 N.E.2d 1211, 1217, 498 N.Y.S.2d 99, 105 (1985) (citations omitted); see also Sharrock, 45 N.Y.2d at 157, 408 N.Y.S.2d at 45, 379 N.E.2d 1169 (state action exists where State delegates "one of the essential attributes of sovereignty"). (Am.Complt. at 29.) 89.) 34.) at 28-29.) Plaintiffs allege that defendant limited their right to institute an action in any court or administrative agency in violation of 101(a)(4) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. Every construction worker deserves the wages and protections guaranteed by a union contract. By Order dated January 4, 2000, the New York State Supreme Court ordered that the documents be preserved, but did not order production. at 1.) The agreement provided for raises totaling 16%; longevity increases of $600; elimination of the Senior ACA title, with a guarantee that Senior ACAs would receive the contractual raises and the ability to transfer to the title of ACA; and an agreement by the County not to seek to have any other persons or positions in the bargaining unit designated managerial or confidential until December 29, 2001. (Am.Complt. Individual pay rates will, of course, vary depending on the job, department, location, as well as the individual skills and education of each employee. Id. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), the moving party is entitled to summary judgment if the "pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Sch. In so doing, the Union and the County agreed to exclude plaintiffs from the bargaining unit. (Lucyk Aff. Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. ( Id. at 15.) 1966). The undisputed facts here show that the County, and not the Union, suggested and insisted upon the removal of plaintiff's job titles from the bargaining unit. (Am. Office of Inspector General - General Audits, Office of Inspector General - Investigations, Office of Inspector General - Ongoing Reviews, Office of Inspector General - Peer Review, 1947 Taft-Hartley Passage and NLRB Structural Changes, Impact of the NLRB on Professional Sports, The Standard for Determining Joint-Employer Status, Voter List and Military Ballots Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, National Labor Relations Board Rulemaking, National Labor Relations Board Rulemaking Archive, Retaliation Based on Exercise of Workplace Rights Is Unlawful, Advice Memoranda Dealing with Handbook Rules post-Boeing, Advice Memoranda and Emails Dealing with COVID-19, Appellate Court Briefs and Petitions filed by the General Counsel, Contempt, Compliance, and Special Litigation Branch Briefs, Information on Decisions Issued by January 4, 2012 Board Member Appointees, Injunction Litigation Branch Appellate Briefs, Petitions for Review & Applications for Enforcement, Interagency & International Collaboration, Unfair Labor Practice and Representation Cases Filed per Fiscal Year, Disposition of Unfair Labor Practice Cases, Unfair Labor Practice Cases by Filing Party per Fiscal Year, Unfair Labor Practice Charges Filed Each Year, Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government, Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules, Compliance Case - Certificate of Compliance*, Teamsters Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters. B. As a matter of law, plaintiffs have failed to state a claim under LMRDA 101(a)(1). 1834, 1996 U.S. Dist. Manuli said what's currently on the table in negotiations would not include retroactive pay raises for the past two. I, 17. Teamsters Joint Council 39 Endorses Janet Protasiewicz for Wisconsin Supreme Court. income of employees making more than $50,000 Avg. 401 et seq. The parties in this case have cross-moved for summary judgment on all of the claims listed above. 1983 and the 14th Amendment, alleging disparate treatment between plaintiffs and other members of the bargaining unit. See In the Matter of Ramapo Police Benevolent Ass'n, 33 N.Y.P.E.R.B. New York, NY 10011 ", McGovern v. Local 456, Intern. Section 1983 allows an individual to bring suit against persons who, under color of state law, have caused him to be "depriv[ed] of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws" of the United States. ( Id.). x, Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability. EIN: 13-6804536. Plaintiffs' twelfth cause of action alleges that "[t]he conduct of the Local 456 against the plaintiffs constituted a deprivation of plaintiffs' right to form, join and participate in any employee organization of their own choosing in violation of New York State Civil Service Law." 415. Breach of Duty of Fair Representation. See, e.g., Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830, 835, 102 S.Ct. Without any evidence supporting plaintiffs' allegations of defendant's self-dealing, these allegations are insufficient to avoid summary judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs' Claims Pursuant to the United States Constitution. at 30.) II. What kinds of nonprofits do foundations support? Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers Int'l Ass'n Local Union No. Teamsters, Local 456 Leaders, Employees, and Salaries 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 $0 $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $100,000 Avg. at 56.) of Teamsters, 120 F.3d 341, 348-49 (2d Cir. By . 1983. Defendant argues that because the due process and equal protection clauses of the New York State Constitution do not apply to private conduct, Montalvo v. Consolidated Edison Co., 92 A.D.2d 389, 393-94, 460 N.Y.S.2d 784, 787 (N.Y.App.Div. Plaintiffs argue that defendant failed to "advise and assist them in seeking to protect their rights." RPS Principals Join Teamsters Local 592. ), On October 2, 1998, the County and Local 456 resumed negotiations. The due process clause of the New York State Constitution provides, in relevant part: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." Plaintiffs' tenth cause of action alleges a violation of their right to form, join or participate in a labor organization as guaranteed by the New York State Constitution. 1978); Broomer v. Schultz, 239 F. Supp. Password (at least 8 characters required). allianz ticket insurance. See Stelling v. International Bhd. ( Id. Plaintiffs have put forth no evidence creating a material issue of fact concerning these causes of action. 32, 34.) endstream endobj 5586 0 obj <. ( Id. Local 456 represents many of the public workers in the City of Yonkers, the Town of Greenwich, and surrounding municipalities. Relevant sections of collective bargaining agreements between organized and management are being provided below as these agreements provide guidance to the Department when setting prevailing wage rates. (Am.Complt. Further, plaintiffs have put forth no evidence to support their allegations that the Union negotiators were engaged in self-dealing. ( Id. Local 456 proposed that the Senior ACAs who wanted to remain in the bargaining unit should be allowed to transfer to non-senior ACA positions while retaining their higher wages. Plaintiffs allege that defendant violated their constitutional rights to due process, equal protection and to participate in a labor organization. ( Id. Plaintiffs also bring an equal protection cause of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. (Am.Complt. at 13.) ( Id. ku grad school application deadline; 2020 toyota camry trd edmonton; why do crickets chirp after rain; how many jordans did tinker hatfield design; beretta 92x performance grips Reply Mem. local 456 teamsters wagespcl curvature estimation. D. Failure to Advise of LMRDA Provisions. Brown merely stands for the proposition that there exists a cause of action for damages resulting from violations of the equal protection clause of the New York State Constitution. . (Pls.Mem. Plaintiffs assert that Local 456 "arbitrarily and discriminatorily [sic] singled out a group of its members for removal and then declined to insist on a PERB hearing but instead consent[ed] to the removal language into a collective bargaining agreement . . . . Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition. Plaintiffs' eleventh cause of action asserts that defendant's conduct constituted a "deprivation of plaintiffs' right to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing in violation of the New York State Constitution." Teamsters Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters | National Labor Relations Board Home Teamsters Local 456, International Brotherhood of Teamsters E-File Follow Case Number: 02-CP-189159 Date Filed: 12/05/2016 Status: Closed Location: Bronx, NY Region Assigned: Region 02, New York, New York Docket Activity Items per page 1 2 Next Local 456 submitted affidavits and legal argument to oppose plaintiffs' efforts in state court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for defendant. 9-20.) 33, Ex. WESTCHESTER TEAMSTERS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES WELFARE FUND LOCAL 456. at 19.) Proudly created with Wix.com. Local 456 and Westchester County have negotiated three successive collective bargaining agreements which were effective for the two-year periods January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1993, January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995 and January 1, 1996 through December 31, 2001. The letter requested "copies of any and all documents . Plaintiffs base their allegations under section 101(a)(4) on their assertion that in order to remove plaintiffs from the collective bargaining unit, the County was required to request that the PERB designate the title of Senior ACA as "managerial" or confidential. ( Id. It looks like nothing was found at this location. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Thus, plaintiffs have failed to raise a material issue of fact on their breach of duty of fair representation claim, and summary judgment is granted to defendant on this claim. Defendant asserts that under section 204, the Union is authorized to remove job titles from a bargaining unit pursuant to agreement with the employer. TEAMSTERS Plaintiffs' briefs did not include a discussion of the merits of either of these claims. Defendant argues that although expulsion is a form of discipline under section 101(a)(5), plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that there was a punitive aspect to their removal from the bargaining unit. This Court agrees. The Docket Activity list does not reflect all actions in this case. Plaintiffs bring these constitutional claims against the Union pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Yonkers Municipal Housing and International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), Local 456 (2008) (MOA) Yonkers Parking Authority and City of Yonkers Parking Authority Unit 9322, CSEA, Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Westchester County Local 860 (2006) York Central School Board of Education and York Central School Bus Driver Association (2002) Assuming, arguendo, that defendant did "arbitrarily and discriminatorily [sic] single out a group of its members for removal," plaintiffs were not denied any right to vote that was granted to others. 4504 (2000) (recognizing the right of public employers and public employee unions to alter by agreement the composition of their bargaining units); In the Matter of Onondaga-Cortland-Madison BOCES Fed'n of Teachers, 25 N.Y.P.E.R.B. ( Id. See 587 F.2d at 1391 (noting that the plaintiffs failed to raise the issue with the union, and immediately sought judicial relief, while affirming district court's dismissal of section 105 claim). 118.) Plaintiffs' amended complaint fails to allege the existence of a conspiracy between the County and defendant Union in agreeing to remove the Senior ACAs from the collective bargaining unit. ." We are driven by a single goal; to do our part in making the workplace a better place for all and ensure we create the best environment to ensure a better life for our members. 212-691-7074, A Year of Progress for New York Teamsters, Local 456 protests Mill Creek development, Local 456 Rallies for Good Construction Jobs, TEMP Act to Protect Workers from Extreme Heat, Governor Hochul Blocks E-Commerce Project, Saves Freeport Park, New York Heating Workers Approve Citywide Union Contract with Big Raises. 1998). local 456 teamsters wagesbrick police blotter. website until it is completed. The County and the Union did not conspire, and the County did not delegate any authority to the Union. Like the plaintiffs in Breininger, plaintiffs here allege that the Union negotiators were self-dealing and protecting their own job titles. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief and compensatory damages for this alleged constitutional violation. Finally, plaintiffs bring a cause of action for failure to advise plaintiffs of the LMRDA's provisions, pursuant to section 105 of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. of Wappingers Cen. Here, plaintiffs admit that every member of the bargaining unit received a letter from the president of the Union advising them of the ratification vote for the collective bargaining agreement, and attaching a copy of the agreement. In Civil Service Bar Association, the union filed a grievance on behalf of all attorneys affected after the city hired an associate attorney at a salary $3,000 higher than the stated minimum salary for that position. Although the case law interpreting section 105 is limited, the provision is clear on its face. japanese translator salary in canada; canucks roster 2021 2022; local 456 teamsters wageshelping paws okanagan. See Thomas, 201 F.3d at 521. at 31. Members for A Better Union v. Bevona, 152 F.3d 58, 65 (2d Cir. 83.) at 20.) art. Local 456 is a Labor Union who believes that with a. Teamsters Local 456 | Elmsford NY Contrary to their allegations, plaintiffs were not expelled from the Union. Denial of Equal Protection With Respect to Voting Rights, Plaintiffs also allege that defendant's conduct constituted discrimination against plaintiffs and in favor of others with respect to voting rights, in violation of section 101(a)(1) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. 814, 820 (N.D.N.Y. FOIA Branch. The claims for damages under the New York State Constitution that were sustained in Brown were against the state of New York. Although the state and its political subdivisions, including the County, are excluded from the definition of "employer" contained in section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. In the legal profession, information is the key to success. 92-93.). Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.Youll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Program areas at International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 456. 1867, and is retrospective in nature. 160 S Central Ave, Elmsford, NY 10523, USA, 2022 by Teamsters. LEXIS 7621, at *26, 1996 WL 296538 (E.D.Pa. III. 1974) Copy Citation Unable to load document We were unable to load this document's text. ( Id. (Lisa F. Colin Aff.) (Lucyk Aff. In April, the County and Local 456 were at a deadlock. Hence, the threshold inquiry under the New York State Constitution is essentially whether the state has been sufficiently implicated in the challenged activity to transform such activity into state action. All members of the bargaining unit, including plaintiffs, were given an opportunity to vote on the agreement. Additional copies of the agreement were provided at the meeting, and all questions about the agreement were answered. Local 456 did not oppose exclusion of the Assistants to the County Executive and the Coordinator of Veteran Affairs. ELMSFORD, NY 10523-3521 | Tax-exempt since Nov. 1982. 3), they put forth no evidence to show that plaintiffs were expelled. 212-691-7074, TEMP Act to Protect Workers from Extreme Heat, Governor Hochul Blocks E-Commerce Project, Saves Freeport Park, New York Heating Workers Approve Citywide Union Contract with Big Raises. In evaluating each motion, the court must look at the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Teamsters Local 456 represents workers in Westchester and Putnam Counties. CONST., art. ", It is unclear which section of the New York State Civil Service Law plaintiffs allege has been violated. Plaintiffs allege that the Union's actions resulted in the deprivation of their Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection. Roy Barnes, P.C., Elmsford, NY, for defendant, Wendell V. Shepherd, Adrienne C. Paule, of counsel. Workers Local Union, 587 F.2d 1379, 1390-91 (9th Cir. It is well established that in order to state a claim under 1983, a plaintiff must allege (1) that the challenged conduct was attributable at least in part to a person acting under color of state law, and (2) that such conduct deprived the plaintiff of a right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States. at 14.). Dialectic helps businesses and organizations improve the way people work, learn, and collaborate through person-centred design and the latest in social psychology, industrial organizational psychology, neuroscience, and behavioural economics. 2000). (Am.Complt. 1998.) Complt. VI. art. 96 Civ. Kress Co., 398 U.S. 144, 150, 90 S.Ct. 2023, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us | Legal Jobs | Advertise with Law360 | Careers at Law360 | Terms | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Help | Site Map, Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement, and Legal Services Funds et al v. M. Velardo Enterprises, Inc. et al, Teamsters Local 456 Pension, Health & Welfare, Annuity, Education & Training, Industry Advancement, and Legal Services Funds by Louis A. Picani, Joseph Sansone, Dominick Cassanelli, Jr., Saul Singer, et al v. Koski Trucking, Inc. et al, Amalgamated Union Local 450-A Welfare Fund et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al. at 17. purpose the improvement of wages, hours and other conditions of employment of municipal employees. N.Y. Although plaintiffs dispute this fact, (Pls. at 30.) The Organization represents its membership in securing employment, sustaining the standard of wages, resolving differences and maintaining harmony in employer/employee relationships and negotiating working conditions and benefits. 1.) The Union and the County may agree as to the composition of the bargaining unit, see Section V., supra, therefore the LMRDA was not violated by the County's, or the Union's, failure to have plaintiffs' job title designated "managerial" or "confidential.". International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 456 is child organization, under the parent exemption from. 29 U.S.C. at 75-76.). ( Id. reciprocal rights . ^4oz7oDsq:F7&+|~^wXQ^a!5x DNE QtkQ9p!t See Sharrock, 45 N.Y.2d at 160, 408 N YS.2d at 44, 379 N.E.2d 1169. Discipline is retaliatory in nature, see Finnegan, 456 U.S. at 436, 102 S.Ct. The Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) requires unions to report how they spent their money in a number of categories. craft: teamster (applies only to work on the construction site) determination: nc-23-261-1 . Call for hours and availability. (Am.Complt. 411(a)(5), for deprivation of their right to procedural protections prior to expulsion from the collective bargaining unit. Contained in those reports are breakdowns of each union's spending, income and other financial information. Nonprofit Tax Code Designation: 501 (c) (9) Defined as: Voluntary employees beneficiary associations, which provide payment of life, sickness, accident or other benefits to members. Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. ( Id.) In Miller v. Holden, 535 F.2d 912, 914-15 (5th Cir. As discussed above, plaintiffs admit, for the purposes of this motion, that all but two paragraphs in Lucyk's affidavit are true. See In the Matter of Patrick T. Maddock, 29 N YP.E.R.B. 3062 (1987); In the Matter of Obdulio Brignoni, Jr., 32 N.Y.P.E.R.B. Therefore, defendant did not act under the color of state law, and cannot be subject to liability under section 1983. One of our greatest strengths is the support and participation our active and retired members display with their continued involvement in our campaigns and political endeavors. at 23. Every statement in defendant's Rule 56.1 Statement is supported by a citation to Lucyk's affidavit, but no statement relies upon paragraphs 34 or 35 of Lucyk's affidavit. Check your network connection and try again. 826, 828 (S.D.N.Y. at 102.) See United States v. Int'l Bhd. Here, plaintiffs were not designated "managerial" or "confidential," but their job titles were removed, upon agreement between the Union and the County and with the approval of the Union membership, from the bargaining unit. Local 456 represents many of the public workers in the City of Yonkers, the Town of Greenwich, and surrounding municipalities. Teamsters Local 294 President John Bulgaro and Secretary Treasurer Tom Quackenbush presented the Heroes Award to Glens Falls UPS member Matthew Bailey today. While the salaries for Teamster officers have come down over the years, CEO pay has skyrocketed. Teamsters, Local 456 Basic Info Basic Information Local 456 Quick Facts Members 6,867 Assets $5,125,137 Employees 18 Primary Industry Construction Address TEAMSTERS 160 SOUTH CENTRAL AVE. ELMSFORD, NY 10523 2023 Nonprofit Metrics LLCTerms of Service and Privacy Policy. Local 456 members also deliver fuel oil and gas and drive school buses. Source: Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. UPS Teamsters Supplemental Negotiations Update. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. A private individual may be subject to liability under this section if he or she willfully collaborated with an official state actor in the deprivation of the federal right. at 57.) Teamsters Local 456 members, the proud essential service workers in the private sector you see everyday working hard during these difficult times to ensure our infrastructure is safe and secure for. 1983. at 914-15. A group of attorneys sued the union, alleging that they would have received more favorable benefits under the original arbitrator award than they would under the settlement. Our data and tools help professionals prospect for nonprofits, research opportunities, benchmark their clients, and enrich existing information. pennsylvania supreme court judges; 4618 forthbridge drive houston, tx; lincoln memorial events; chemerinsky, constitutional law syllabus Plaintiffs allege that, in violation of section 101(a)(4) of the LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. Rule 56(e), to create a genuine, Full title:Kyle MCGOVERN, Linda Trentacoste Spagnuolo, Richard Cashman and William, Court:United States District Court, S.D. 2764, 73 L.Ed.2d 418 (1982); Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535, 101 S.Ct. Although an employee may be designated as "managerial" or "confidential" only upon application of the employer to the PERB, see N.Y. Civil Serv. For the first five, OLMS requires unions to provide detailed information on any recipient that received more than $5,000 per year. D.) Plaintiffs never requested information about the LMRDA's provisions, but instead immediately sought judicial relief, just as the plaintiffs in Stelling had. We strive to build productive and beneficial relationships with all of our endeavors. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 673, Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated with Ibt, International Brotherhood of teamsters Local 653 TCWH, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 414, Teamsters - Teamster Food Processors Drivers Warehousemen and Helpers Local No 670, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 777, Chief Operating Officer salaries at nonprofits. ( Id. I, 6. at 33.) gabriel iglesias volkswagen collection. Plaintiffs' first cause of action alleges that they were deprived property rights without due process in violation of 42 U.S.C.